Step Transaction Doctrine Remains a Key Concern for Successful Planning

The step-transaction doctrine is an essential yet often overlooked principle in estate planning and tax strategy. It allows the IRS to reclassify a series of formally separate steps as a single integrated transaction, potentially disqualifying strategies intended to achieve specific tax benefits. For practitioners, understanding the nuances of this doctrine is critical to successfully navigating complex planning scenarios and protecting their clients’ interests.

 

What Is the Step-Transaction Doctrine?
At its core, the step-transaction doctrine is a rule that enables the IRS to collapse multiple steps into one transaction if they believe the steps were not truly independent but rather part of a prearranged plan. Courts typically use three tests to evaluate whether the doctrine applies:

  1. Mutual Interdependence Test: Are the steps so interdependent that one step wouldn’t make sense without the others? For example, does step 1 rely on step 3 for its purpose to be fulfilled?
  2. End Result Test: Were the steps designed solely to achieve a single, predetermined outcome? If the end goal was clear from the start, the steps are at risk of being collapsed.
  3. Binding Commitment Test: Was there a pre-existing obligation to complete all the steps in the plan? If so, the separate steps might be treated as one.

These tests provide the framework for assessing whether transactions are independentor part of a unified plan.

Why the Step-Transaction Doctrine Matters
With tax laws continually evolving, practitioners must be prepared to adapt their strategies to protect their clients. For example, the upcoming reduction in the estate tax exemption in January 2026 presents a unique planning opportunity, but it also underscores the importance of structuring transactions carefully to avoid IRS scrutiny. By properly structuring steps and allowing sufficient time between them, practitioners can minimize the likelihood of the IRS invoking the step-transaction doctrine. However, timing alone is not enough—documenting the economic and legal independence of each step is equally crucial.

Lessons from Case Law
Case law provides valuable insights into how courts evaluate the step-transaction doctrine. One notable example is the Smaldino v. Commissioner case, which serves as a cautionary tale for practitioners.
In this case:

  • A husband gifted LLC interests to his wife, who then transferred them to a trust the next day.
  • The court determined the steps were prearranged and interdependent, violating the step-transaction doctrine.

Key Takeaways:

  • Allow sufficient time between steps to demonstrate independence.
  • Respect the ownership and responsibilities of all parties involved.
  • Avoid creating a paper trail that suggests a prearranged plan (e.g., emails or memos that explicitly outline the steps as a single strategy).

Practical Tips for Practitioners
To help ensure compliance and reduce the risk of IRS scrutiny, practitioners should follow these best practices:

  1. Document Each Step: Ensure each step in the transaction is supported by signed agreements and completed documentation. This demonstrates that the steps are not reliant on one another.
  2. Involve Independent Parties: Bringing in third parties, such as independent trustees or advisors, adds credibility and reinforces the independence of each step.
  3. Focus on Economic Substance: Show that each step had standalone significance beyond the overall plan. For example, if assets are transferred, ensure they are actively used or invested in a meaningful way before proceeding with the next step.
  4. Communicate Risks: Educate clients on the risks associated with compressed timelines and document their acknowledgment of these risks in writing.
  5. Collaborate Across Teams: Attorneys, CPAs, and other advisors should coordinate to ensure tax compliance accurately reflects the structure and timing of the transactions.

The Importance of Early Planning
The closer we get to significant deadlines—such as the end of 2025—the more challenging it becomes to properly structure and execute plans. Starting early allows for:

  • More time to space out steps in a transaction.
  • Greater flexibility to respond to client needs and evolving tax laws.
  • Reduced risk of errors or omissions due to rushed planning.

Conclusion
The step-transaction doctrine is a complex but critical concept for estate planners and tax professionals. By understanding its nuances and implementing thoughtful planning strategies, practitioners can help protect their client’s planning from being successfully challenged by the IRS.

For more information on estate planning strategies or to consult with experts in trust administration, contact Peak Trust Company today.